When it comes to defending an arson case under California Penal Code Section 452, it's crucial to have an attorney with extensive experience. The road ahead is challenging, as prosecutors, judges, and even the police take these cases very seriously, often seeking to send an arson offender to prison for an extended period.
Having an experienced attorney by your side can provide reassurance and confidence in your legal representation.
So, you have to figure out whether or not you've got a defense to the case. Defenses—when it comes to an arson case or even any case in criminal defense—tend to center around whether the person committed the crime.
Pre-Filing Intervention
If you're not the person and the prosecutors don't have the evidence to prove it, you'll go to jury trial and be found not guilty. Sometimes, I can convince the prosecutors not to file the case at all or dismiss a case they filed once we show them that the client is not the one involved. This possibility for a positive outcome can bring hope and optimism in an otherwise challenging situation.
Another angle is to say, "Listen, this was a mistake. I didn't do this on purpose." I had no intent to light this fire and commit this crime that you've charged me with.
That can be shown in a number of different ways, and it really just depends on the facts and circumstances surrounding your case. There are all sorts of different defenses that can be utilized, but it's obvious it's not a cookie-cutter thing.
You're going to use a defense that applies to your case, and you're going to sit down, and you're going to tell your attorney all the details about your case. You're not going to omit anything, or you're not going to put any type of a spin on the facts of the case because that's just going to put your attorney at a disadvantage against the prosecutor.
So, in dealing with an arson case, in addition to having a defense that makes sense based on your case's facts and evidence, you will want an attorney to put everything together for you and defend your case.
Your attorney will not only understand the legal system but also be familiar with the judges, the prosecutors, and all the players in the criminal justice system you find yourself in. They will guide you through the legal process, advise you on your options, and advocate for your rights.
So, get somebody local. Get somebody who knows the ropes, has been down this path before, and can get you the desired result.
In addition to learning the courthouse, the attorney will know how to defend an arson case. If you can't protect the case that your client is charged with and you don't have experience with it, then obviously, you won't get the result they must have. Your attorney should have been involved in similar cases and gotten good results on your behalf.
Defining a Win in an Arson Case
Defining a 'win' in your arson case is a crucial step that can empower you and give you a sense of control over your situation. Most people think that a win is defined in any criminal case by either the prosecutor deciding not to file the case or dismissing it, or you go to a jury trial, and you're found not guilty, and then you've won your case. Unfortunately, that's not the majority of cases that happen in criminal defense.
Most of the time, the prosecutors do not file a case unless they have the evidence on it because they will be embarrassed if they go to trial—especially in an arson case—which will probably get publicity. They will be beaten and embarrassed, and the person will be found not guilty.
The public will start to say, well, why were you prosecuting that person in the first place? What kind of a justice system is this? So, they typically choose cases only if they've got good evidence against the person. So, one of the first things you should do when you sit down with your attorney is to define what a win is.
Obviously, everybody wants to win, where they're found not guilty, they get to go home, and they're done with the case.
But if that's not realistic in your case and they've got the evidence to show that you committed a crime, or the crime that you've been charged with, then you've got to come up with another strategy.
This is where 'defining a win' becomes crucial. It's about setting realistic expectations and understanding what the best possible outcome could be given the circumstances of your case. And that's why when people walk into my office and we talk about the case – I look at them – I say, what do you want out of this case?
Here's what they've got. Here's what we can argue. What do you realistically want? Then we talk about it. Once we have a definition of a win in their particular case, we set about investigating and putting together the stuff that will show the prosecutors that they are entitled to get what we want.
So, once we've defined a win, we must also explain how we will help you get the desired result. What is a realistic result, and what am I going to do—what plan am I going to execute towards getting that result?
Then we'll work together, put everything together, and then I'll set about getting the result that we both agreed is the best in your particular circumstances, and that takes hard work.
That takes experience and know-how, and obviously, you're going to have to assist as well.
I find the client sometimes can come up with some good stuff that can be utilized because they know their case. This 'good stuff' could be anything from providing alibis, character witnesses, or evidence that contradicts the prosecution's case. They're also trying to think outside the box because they want the result.
So, once you define your win, you've got your criminal defense attorney who knows what they're doing and can execute the plan, and then you go to work, doing everything possible to get the result.
Related Content:
