Every Criminal Defendant Has The Right To Face Their Accuser
In a lot of Los Angeles cases, prosecutors are trying to get around this right to face their accuser. So, in general, any time there is a criminal case and someone is a witness against somebody and their evidence is critical, material and crucial in order to prosecute and convict that person, that person has to come into court face-to-face and testify against the criminal defendant, otherwise their testimony in not allowed in. It’s declared hearsay, but there’s a whole bunch of different exceptions to that.
For example, at a preliminary hearing in a felony criminal case in Los Angeles, witnesses — even material witnesses — don’t have to come to the preliminary hearing. The prosecutor can use the detective to testify to what those witnesses told the detective or use police officers to testify to what those witnesses said. It’s their choice. That’s Proposition 115, which — for convenience of witnesses — lets them do that at a preliminary hearing in a felony case. But, if that same witness doesn’t show up for trial, most of the time, that testimony is not going to be allowed in. But, they’ve even carved out an exception for that — the Crawford case in domestic violence cases. They’re letting in all sorts of different testimony and evidence. For example, they’re letting in a 9-1-1 tape.
They’re letting in a body cam video. I see prosecutors trying to get that in when their witness doesn’t show up and is not present to be cross-examined. So, these are obviously all things that criminal defense attorneys are going to argue against, because they are not getting the right for their client to face their accuser. You should be able to cross-examine that accuser. The jury should be able to look at the person and see whether they’re lying when they get challenged on cross-examination. So, these are all things that must be argued and must be zealously fought for, otherwise there’s a recent case I saw federally where they were trying to let a pregnant witness — who was a material crucial witness in the case — testify by way of two-way radio because she was seven months pregnant. The court overturned that verdict because they said, you have to have a right to face your accuser.
We want the jury to see what the witness looks like, listen to them testify face-to-face and of course, be able to cross-examine them and see how they react to certain questions. There are certain things witnesses do. I hear all the time when I do jury trials, we looked at that witness. We didn’t believe a word that the said. So, the bottom line is we, as a defense community, have to continue to fight to make sure our clients have the right to face their accusers, and as the prosecutors and judges try to short circuit this right and try to get around it, we have to fight them at every single turn. So, if you have a situation where you’re innocent and you believe you have the right to face your accuser and you think there may be some issues with that, give me a call. We’ll sit down. We’ll talk about it. You’ll lay out the circumstances and I will see what I can do to fight for you if you’ve got a criminal case in Los Angeles and you want that right to face your accuser.